If you want 96khz capability, then perhaps look at an M-Audio PCIe soundcard for around $100. Not a big hit to the pocket to try something! If you don’t like it, you can sell it on an auction site for $10 less than you paid. Mastering for Vinyl : Recording Magazine -īehringer UCA-202 sounds good. This is a good article on how vinyl is mastered. It stops vibrations from getting back into the platter. I get much better rips when the speakers are not on during the recording process. Of course you could get a lower noise ADC if you want to spend more money. So not quite up to redbook standards, but still better than the noise from my phono stage. However upon measuring it, I can see that its self noise is at from memory -75db FS. So no problems with detail from the Behringer! I believe that its ADC works better than its DAC. I say this because when I compare rips of the LP to the same album on CD, I almost always get more detail from the vinyl rip. The Behringer UCA-202 is a good cheap device. For many years I thought that LP was vastly superior sound quality to CD, but after I recorded some LP's to digital files, I found that the digital file sounds exactly (well, close enough) to playing LP, that I realised that it is not that vinyl has superior sound, but that I much prefer the way the audio is mastered for vinyl. This I have found to be the primary difference in sound between LP and CD. Actually I find the sound of vinyl is largely due to the way the audio is mastered, which is quite different to how CD is mastered. Despite it only having maximum 48Khz 16bit, the sound is surprisingly very good. I use a Behringer UCA-202 plugged into my phono stage to rip some vinyl.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |